The
University Senate of Michigan Technological University
Proposal
22-14
(Voting
Units: Academic)
Proposal
to Change Degree Title from “MS in Rhetoric and Technical Communication” to “MS
in Rhetoric, Theory and Culture”
1.
General
description and characteristics: This is a modification of the title to reflect
the program’s alignment with emerging trends of the discipline.
2.
Related
program in Michigan: MS in Writing and Rhetoric at Michigan State University
3.
Rationale:
Over the past 40 years, Michigan Tech’s
Humanities department has twice developed innovative programs that had broad
national impact —we established the first “Writing across the Curriculum” (WAC)
program in the late 1970s, and we established the nation’s first PhD degree in
Rhetoric and Technical Communication (RTC) in the late 1980s. In each of these instances, we were in a
better position to respond to changing conditions than other departments
precisely because we are an interdisciplinary Humanities department in a STEM-focused
research university. Now we are in a
strong position to lead the profession once again, and this name change
reflects that strength.
In
changing our name we have retained the key word “Rhetoric.” To educators in the Humanities, this term
implies “communication,” and signals our commitment to understand communication
in relation to its “historicity” and systemic functions.
Our
second term—“Theory”— indicates our program’s focus on issues of the
relationship between humans and their technologies. For scholars in the Humanities, the term invokes
a tradition of scholarship concerned with the modern world’s changing
relationships among individuals, our languages and social structures, and our
physical environments. Networked
environments and social media such as Facebook and Twitter are profoundly
changing the ways people communicate in all areas of work, family and social
life. These developments call for new
ways of communicating that incorporate visual design with conventional text,
and deploy various rhetorical strategies across different delivery platforms
such as mobile phones and tablets. The
fast-paced developments in digital media require the teaching of new skills, and
new ways of teaching. The term “Theory” expresses
our commitment to explore and develop these methods and to prepare our
graduates to take them into their future classrooms and workplaces.
Our
third term—“Culture”—reinforces our emphasis on communication and social
interaction. The term also refers to our expertise in areas such as diversity
and globalization. Globalization is
transforming our workplaces and our societies.
Students who can recognize and understand cultural differences will be
better equipped for the job market and for their future lives.
In
the late 1980s, the name “Rhetoric and Technical Communication” was a shot
across the bow of traditional English and Communication graduate programs. It signaled our intention to prepare graduate
students for an emerging but under-served sector of the academic
marketplace. Now, there are 76 PhD
programs that use “Composition” or “Technical Communication” in the
titles. Nearly 70 of them are housed in
English departments. Something that sets
our program apart from these programs is our interdisciplinarity. We are the only department offering this kind
of degree from a faculty that includes nationally recognized scholars of
Rhetoric and Composition; Technical Communication; Communication; Culture and
Media Studies; English; Linguistics; Modern Languages (Chinese, French, German
and Spanish); and Philosophy. We have
scholars working at the leading edge of technological change and globalization.
And we have maintained our traditional strengths in Rhetoric, Composition
Studies and Technical Communication. Our
new name retains the initials “RTC” with the intention of emphasizing the
continuity of the program. Just as the
designation “Rhetoric and Technical Communication” was the herald of a
significant movement twenty-five years ago, “Rhetoric, Theory and Culture” will
mark our program’s leadership in the discipline during the next twenty-five
years.
4.
Curriculum
design: There are no “White Binder” changes necessary for the name change,
although we do plan to add one new course next year (see #5 below). Internally, we plan to expand the number of
required areas of study for both the PhD and MS from three to four.
5.
New
course descriptions: We are developing a
new course entitled “Critical Approaches to Globalization,” which will be
submitted in the White Binder process next fall. Please note that this course
would have been proposed regardless of the title change.
6.
Additional
resources: Requires no additional resources.
7.
Accreditation
requirements. No additional
accreditation requirements.
8.
Planned
implementation date: The proposed change
will be implemented in the 2014-2015 academic year.
Approved by
vote of the Humanities faculty April 8, 2013.
Approved by
Chair of the Humanities Department April 8, 2013.
Approved by College
of Sciences and Arts Dean
Approved by
Provost
Introduced to Senate: 05 March 2014
Approved by Senate: 26 March 2014
Approved by Administration: 03 April 2014
Approved by BOC: 02 May 2014
Approved by State: 05 June 2014