The University
Senate
of Michigan Technological University
Minutes of Meeting 530
6 March 2013
Synopsis: Presentation: “Accreditation, Assessment, and General
Education” by Christa Walck, Associate Provost
1. Call to order
and roll call. President
Bill Bulleit called the University Senate Meeting 530
to order at 5:30 pm on Wednesday, March 6, 2013. The Senate Secretary Brian Barkdoll
called roll. Absent were representatives of the Army/Air Force ROTC,
Kinesiology and Integrative Physiology, Administration, Finance, and
Technology.
Recognition of
visitors. Guests included
Max Seel (Provost’s
Office), Christa Walck (Provosts Office), Andrew Storer (School of Forest Resources and Environmental
Sciences), Bonnie Gorman (Dean of Students Office), Suarav
Pathak (School of Business and Economics), and Ellen
Marks (Library).
2.
Approval of agenda. Bulleit asked if there
were any changes. There being no additional suggestions, the agenda PASSED on a voice vote.
3.
Approval of minutes from Meeting 529. Bulleit asked if there
were any changes. There being no additional suggestions, the minutes were APPROVED on a voice vote.
4.
Presentation: “Accreditation, Assessment, and General
Education” by Christa Walck, Associate Provost slides
Walck discussed the
switch to Open Pathways accreditation (formerly AQIP) and the new accreditation
criteria which emphasize assessment to improve student learning. Regarding assessment, she reviewed the University
Learning Goals and recent recommendations to shift “human culture” from goal 2,
which will now be Knowledge of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, to goal 3,
which will be Global Literacy and Human Culture. . She
stated that direct embedded assessment is to be emphasized. Michigan may become a LEAP state, which could
offer opportunities to benchmark our goals. In 2013-4, all degree programs will assess
Goal 5: Communication. To help prepare,
she encouraged participation in the Center for Teaching and Learning’s Communication
Workshop on March 28. Regarding General Education, Walck
reported that additional changes to Gen Ed would be proposed in Fall 2013 for implementation in Fall 2015. Bulleit asked how issues
will be communicated to the Senate. Walck responded that when the Communication and Global
Learning Committees and General Education Council have complete
recommendations, they will work with the Senate Curricular Policy Committee to
bring them to the Senate. Moran suggested that Assessment and Gen Ed Councils coordinate
with faculty working on ABET goals.
5. Reports
a. Senate President
Bulleit
said that Proposals 11-13, 16-13, and 17-13 were approved by the administration
and that Proposal 15-13 was approved by the administration and the BOC. 15-13 still needs to be approved by the Academic
Affairs Officers Council. For future Senate meetings on March 27 there will be
a benefits presentation for which advanced questions can be sent to Renee
Hiller or Bulleit by March 20. On April 10 Dave Reed will
present on university finances for which advanced questions could also be sent
to Bulleit by April 1.
b. Senate Standing Committees
Barr reminded
Senators to ask constituents to complete the benefits survey by the Fringe
Benefits Committee. Riehl
stated that the Elections Committee has called for nominations for spring
elections. Moran requested input for the
issue of courses allowed in research-only mode that he raised
at the last Senate meeting.
6. Old Business:
a. Proposal
12-13: “Modification to Search
Procedures for College Deans” presented by Administrative Policy Committee
(Voting Units: Full Senate)
The proposal PASSED unopposed by hand vote.
b. Proposal
18-13: “Proposal for a Master of
Geographic Information Science (MGIS)” presented by Curricular Policy and
Finance Committee (Voting Units:
Academic)
Mullins said it
cleared Finance Comm. Nooshabadi read a statement of support from the committee.
The proposal PASSED unopposed by hand vote.
7.
New Business
Proposal
19-13 “Proposal for a Spin-Off from “B.S. in
Management” to “B.S. in Management with a Concentration in Entrepreneurship”
presented by Curricular Policy Committee.
Nooshabadi read a statement
of support from the committee. Pathak gave
background on the proposed concentration.
Mullins said that the Senate Finance Committee had not discussed the
proposal yet and asked if making more concentrations will help falling
enrollment. Seel
said some low-enrollment concentrations have been shelved if enrollment was low
and that this one is important.
8.
Adjournment.
President Bulleit
adjourned the meeting at 6:32pm.
Respectfully
submitted
by Brian Barkdoll
Secretary of the
University Senate