|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
University Goal 2: Attract and Retain, Support and Develop Excellent Faculty.In support of both undergraduate education enhancement and graduate program development, the College has made progress in attracting and retaining faculty from nationally and internationally recognized research universities that include Harvard, MIT, Cornell, and Carnegie Mellon. Since 1988, we have increased the number of tenured/tenure track faculty from 126 to 153 (see Table 4 below). Strengths and opportunities which allowed us to attract these faculty include retirements, eight conversions of instructor positions (2 in Computer Science, 3 in Mathematical Sciences, and 3 in Humanities), 19 new faculty lines, a poor job market which created a deep pool of candidates, and the development of graduate and research programs in all degree-granting departments. In the Humanities Department, TAs have replaced most part-time instructors in the first-year-English sequence. Overall, the faculty numbers reflect the change from part-time/temporary instructors to TA/tenure-track faculty, consistent with the implementation of Ph.D. programs and the increase of research expenditures. TABLE 4. College of Sciences and Arts Tenured/Tenure-Track Faculty (Fall Count).
The College of Sciences and Arts was the first unit on campus to improve the tenure and promotion process by systematically updating and clarifying its tenure and promotion guidelines and expectations. Since February of 1992, updated departmental guidelines have been availableheaded by College Summary Guidelines. As a result, the recommendations from faculty (departmental and college committees) and chairs have become very consistent. Pedagogical research has been recognized as a viable path to promotion. More faculty in the College of Sciences and Arts take advantage of sabbaticals than faculty in other colleges and schools. Departments succeed in supporting conference participation and other professional development of their faculty by combining funds from Supplies, Services, and Equipment (SS&E), return on overhead, release time and leaves, and the Michigan Tech Fund. The resulting faculty research profile is discussed in Goal 4. The College continues to make progress in diversifying its faculty ranks. Currently, 30% of our tenured/tenure track faculty are female (47 out of 157). Also, four out of twelve department chairs are female. Minority hiring is still a weakness; we have only two tenured African-American and one Native American faculty.
For the past decade, doctoral-program development has been a high priority for the College (see "Program Developments," above). The Ph.D. program in Rhetoric and Technical Communication has been especially successful in placing its first graduates in tenure track positions at nationally known universities including Purdue, Clemson, and Syracuse. Since 1988, the number of graduate students has increased by 74% from 128 (93 MS, 35 Ph.D.) to 223 (109 MS, 114 Ph.D.). The enrollment figures for the College show that our students make up 29% and 41% of the Universitys masters and Ph.D. student body (see Tables 5 and 6). TABLE 5. Masters Enrollment in the College of Sciences and Arts (Fall Count).
TABLE 6. Doctoral Enrollment in the College of Sciences and Arts (Fall Count).
Tables 7 and 8 show the number of masters and doctoral degrees granted by the College. TABLE 7.Masters Degrees Granted by the College of Sciences and Arts.
TABLE 8. Doctoral Degrees Granted by the College of Sciences and Arts.
Because the MS degree in the College of Sciences and Arts was more traditionally a transitional degree towards the Ph.D. rather than a desired terminal degree, the College chose to put most of its efforts towards Ph.D. degrees. In light of recent employment opportunities for MS graduates, this decision needs to be re-examined. All departments have guidelines which summarize the duties, training, and supervision of graduate student assistants (either teaching or research). For example, the Department of Humanities developed an extensive GTA Handbook for Teaching Composition at MTU in
One opportunity for strengthening the graduate programs is by encouraging interdisciplinary research. A strength is the availability of a highly qualified research faculty among MTU departments and the fact that many of these faculty have overlapping research interests. For example, the Computer Science and Engineering Ph.D. program is designed to be interdisciplinary. Biological Sciences currently has seven graduate students who are conducting their research in biology laboratories but who are members of other departments and who are receiving graduate degrees from departments other than Biological Sciences. A weakness is the fact that the university lacks an administrative mechanism which would allow for interdisciplinary enrollment and provide credit and incentive to pursue these collaborations. A potential barrier to growth is physical space limitations, especially in Fisher Hall (Computer Science, Mathematics, and Physics) and in the Academic Office Building (Social Sciences). This will be discussed in more detail under Goal 7. The completion of the Environmental Sciences Building and space reassignment in the Chemical Sciences and Engineering Building should provide some relief for Biological Sciences and Chemistry. Two other possible weaknesses include inadequate library holdings which frustrate both graduate students and faculty, and the lack of a regularized, centrally administered graduate program review process.
The faculty in the College of Sciences and Arts have a very respectable research profile (Table 9.)
Table 9. College of Sciences and Arts Faculty Research.
Eighty percent of the graduate faculty has been cited in citation indices. Such a large percentage is evidence that these numbers are true average numbers, not numbers generated by a few faculty doing most of the research and scholarship. The faculty of the College exhibits the same trend in externally funded research, which has more than doubled since 1990, from $1.1 million to $2.7 million in 1996 (see Table 9).
TABLE 10. College of Sciences and Arts Research Expenditures per Fiscal Year (Dollars in Thousands).
The relatively high number in 1988 was due in part to a large equipment grant in Physics. Also, in 1989, part of the Physics research funding was transferred (together with the principal investigator) to the College of Engineering. What is even more encouraging and promising than the substantial increase in external funds is the fact that a larger number of faculty from more departments is now successfully engaged in writing and winning grants from a larger group of agencies including National Science Foundation (NSF). The College's grant base has diversified, is less monolithic, and therefore less vulnerable to sudden shifts and changes in trends. It is quite remarkable that the faculty was able to achieve this kind of profile within the context and constraints of our institutional profile of roughly 90% undergraduate and 10% graduate students.
http://www.admin.mtu.edu/admin/nca/appendix/app6sci/ap6scip3.htm © 1997. Michigan Technological University. All Rights Reserved. Send comments and questions about this page to nca-comments@mtu.edu. |